|
BCIFV home
> Newsletter > 1999
Archives > Winter 1999 articles
A Message from the Vice President
In British Columbia, 8% or nearly 40,000 seniors have experienced
some form of abuse. One in 12 seniors has encountered financial
abuse. CEAS has been working toward creating change for abused
seniors by developing information and educational materials
such as Money Matters for Seniors, a video training kit, and
providing education and support to a wide range of community
groups. The guidance seniors have provided for all our projects
has made our materials and workshops the successes they have
become.
CEAS's primary goals are to encourage the development of
local services for abused seniors and to increase public awareness
of abuse of seniors. Yet, our very accomplishments in this
area have confronted us with new challenges. In 1997 alone
CEAS received 100 calls concerning individuals in abusive
situations, a number that has increased steadily during 1998.
How to respond to these calls in an ethical manner while honouring
our constitutional purpose has become a major issue of discussion
for the Board.
There is little doubt that we need resources in the caller's
home community to provide effective and practical assistance
to those seniors most vulnerable to abuse. The issue, however,
becomes more tricky when we consider that resources are not
consistently available in all communities across the province.
Seniors in rural communities may not have easy access to some
support services.
They may not have any choice between resources and don't
trust the service they could access. Yet rural communities
are known to pull together and rally around a cause. This
helps when building coordinated and sensitive responses to
seniors in abusive situations. In smaller communities, local
resources, if available at all, are more visible and easier
to access than a similar resource in a metropolitan center.
Over two-thirds of the calls CEAS receives about individuals
experiencing abuse are from the Lower Mainland. One reason
for this high percentage may be that the urban maze of public
and non-profit agencies is difficult to sort through for any
senior and challenging to coordinate into a Community Response
Network for any facilitator.
Regional differences in the availability as well as the responsiveness
of local agencies and organizations add to the difficulty
for CEAS. Should CEAS keep its current purpose to promote
the rights of all abused seniors by working toward policy
changes and increased public awareness? Or should it adopt
a new goal that includes advocacy for individuals who are
calling for help? Individual advocacy can involve helping
a caller define what the problem is. One-on-one advocacy can
mean offering a referral by contacting the referral resource
and ensuring that the caller receives an appropriate response.
Should CEAS maintain its current purpose and provincial focus
and restrict itself to providing only information to callers
concerned about individual situations? In practice the line
is difficult to draw between these approaches and the "information
only" response may feel uncaring and bureaucratic to
the caller as well as the person answering the phone. On the
other hand, by providing a referral and advocacy service we
might fill a gap in resources and inadvertently let "off
the hook" those communities which have not yet developed
a coordinated response for abused seniors.
A recent survey of our membership has given CEAS clear direction
to not become involved in one-on-one advocacy but rather stay
focussed on the "big picture" as an organization
serving the entire province. Still, the question of how we
can best help prevent and stop abuse of seniors will come
up again in different ways and will be revisited in different
contexts as we evolve as an organization.
-Brigitte Wagner
|