 |
BCIFV home
> Newsletter > 2000
Archives > Winter 2000 articles
PROGRESS REPORT ON... elder abuse
Charmaine Spencer
Simon Fraser University
Gerontology Research Centre
Abuse and neglect of older adults has taken
much longer than other forms of family violence to come into
public awareness as a significant social problem. However,
in the last decade, there have been a number of advances in
the area. Some are subtle, such as a shift in terminology
from "elder abuse" to "senior abuse" or
"abuse and neglect of adults in later life". This
mental shift is helping us move past the ideas of seniors
as automatically "frail" or incapable. It also helps
to place abuse and neglect within a life continuum, where
people can be at risk of different harms at different points
in their lives.
There have been other important developments
as well. During the past decade, we have begun to move past
a superficial understanding of the problem, recognizing that
abuse in later life is not a single-faceted problem. There
has been an increasingly strong role taken by seniors to define
the problem, and not have it defined for them. There has been
commitment from seniors to want to be actively involved in
the approaches that are developed to assist abused seniors.
This is important, as 30-40% of abused seniors decline the
kinds of help currently being offered. There has also been
the gradual recognition across the country of the need to
work together and share strategies, successes and challenges.
One of the potential vehicles for that sharing is the development
of a national network for the prevention of senior abuse,
to identify resources, and areas for policy development. Across
the country, we are also beginning to gradually recognize
that abuse has long-term consequences, and that there are
significant costs of the problem to society as a whole.
In British Columbia, one of the major thrusts
of the last decade in this area has been the development of
coordinated networks in over 65 communities so that abuse
and neglect situations are not dealt with or responded to
in a piecemeal manner. However, it has been a struggle to
have Part 3 of the new adult guardianship legislation developed
and implemented. Part 3 offers assistance and intervention
to people, young and old, who are in an abusive situation
but who are unable to seek support and assistance on their
own because of a physical or mental condition. The challenge
in the future will be to see whether there are adequate funding
resources to match the good intentions of this legislation.
Because this is such a recently identified area,
there are several areas where we could or should concentrate
our efforts in the near future. First, we have to remember
that the "risk" of abuse is not the same for all
older adults. Thus, there is a need for research on the relative
risk of abuse among seniors who are cognitively impaired or
live in institutional settings. Research regarding cognitively
impaired seniors needs to focus not only on risk, but also
on what factors reduce the risk (the "protective factors")
of what might otherwise be a high-risk situation for abuse
or neglect. Research in institutional settings needs to consider
the impact of reduced staffing on the risk of abuse or neglect
to seniors in care, and on their overall quality of life.
Second, we need to strengthen the social norms against abuse.
Much of the abuse that currently occurs, happens because people
feel "entitled" to take the assets of seniors as
their own, or to treat older adults (particularly those in
the care of others) as "lesser persons". Third,
probably the most important direction needed in this area
is a comprehensive provincial and national policy on abuse
or neglect of older adults. This policy will need to be founded
on a respect of older adults as valued members of the community,
understanding their needs, and assuring adequate resources
to prevent its occurrence while addressing it appropriately
when it does occur.
|
 |