 |
BCIFV
home > Newsletter >
Summer 2005
The Women's Health Effects Study
Toward a Better Understanding of the Real Costs of Intimate-Partner Violence Against Women
Colleen Varcoe
Chronic neck and back pain; arthritis; frequent headaches
and migraines; visual problems; unexplained dizziness and
fainting; sexually transmitted infections; unwanted pregnancies;
chronic pelvic pain; gynecological symptoms; hypertension;
viral infections such as colds and flu; peptic ulcers; and
functional or irritable bowel disease. These are the chronic
physical health conditions that researchers have linked with
intimate-partner violence (IPV). (Letourneau, Holmes, and
Chasedunn- Roark, 1999:115-20; Ratner, 1995: 31-46; Campbell
and Lewandowski, 1997: 353-74; Coker, et al, 2000: 451- 7,
553-9).
These conditions may be life long, persisting even after
women have left abusive partners. However, policy and practice
in health care in relation to IPV is typically based on concern
with acute physical injuries that occur when women are in
abusive relationships. The Women’s Health Effects Study is
designed to provide greater understanding of the full range
of health effects of IPV, and a stronger basis for health
policy and practice, particularly regarding women who have
left abusive relationships.
Women’s mental and physical health after leaving abusive
relationships is often affected by their economic status,
and the costs of violence against women are significantly
underestimated. However, economic and social-welfare policies
are usually set independent of consideration of the dynamics
of violence against women. Thus, this study is also designed
to provide better understanding of how IPV affects women’s
financial status and use of health and social services, and
to provide a better basis for linking such understanding to
economic and social policy.
In the Women’s Health Effects Study, an interdisciplinary
team of researchers is recruiting 300 women who have left
abusive partners in the six months to three years prior to
beginning their participation in the study. Women have been
recruited from New Brunswick and Ontario; recruitment is continuing
in BC. Women have been recruited through newspaper ads, posters,
and word-of-mouth, so that, unlike many studies, the women
are not only those who have used formal anti-violence services
such as shelters. Each year for the next four years, the women
will complete structured interviews that include established
instruments to measure physical, emotional, and mental health
as well as their access to personal, social, and economic
resources that support health. The women will also undergo
a physical assessment to measure such things as hearing, balance,
mobility, weight, and blood pressure. In addition, the participants
are providing information that will permit costing estimates
of their health and socialservices use, estimates of their
financial strain, and changes in their economic status over
time.
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
Research conducted over the past 15 years has identi.ed extensive
health effects of IPV. The World Bank Report (Heise, Pitanguy,
and Germain, 1994) identi.ed IPV and rape as signi.cant causes
of morbidity and mortality for women aged 15 to 44 worldwide.
The most common physical injuries experienced by known IPV
victims are multi-site contusions and soft tissue injuries
to the face, head, back, neck, thorax, breast, and abdomen.
(Muellman, Lenaghan, and Pakieser, 1996: 468-92) Even though
these physical injuries are well documented in relation to
IPV, our understanding of the Health problems can persist
for many years after leaving an abusive partner— in some cases,
a lifetime. impact of these consequences on healthcare utilization
is limited and largely based on the US experience. One study
(Humphreys, Parker, and Campbell, 2001: 275-306) found that
less than half of American women injured as a result of IPV
sought health care for their injuries; however, these women
frequently used hospital emergency and primary-care health
services for chronic health concerns associated with IPV.
Mental health is of particular concern for women who have
been abused, both because rates of mental-health problems
are signi.cantly higher for women who have been abused, and
because of their potential to disable an individual. For example,
uni-polar depression “ranks number one among the leading causes
of disability worldwide,” (Murray and Lopez, Ed’s, 1996) and
is one of the most common conditions seen in primary-care
settings. (Coyne, Fechner- Bates, and Schwenk, 1994: 267-76)
Women currently living with an abusive partner and those
who have left in the past year experience higher rates of:
clinical depression; acute and chronic symptoms of anxiety;
protracted disabling sleep disturbances; symptoms consistent
with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); substance use
and dependence; and thoughts of suicide (Eby, et al, 1995:
563-76; Fischbach and Herbert, 1997: 1161-76; Humphreys, et
al, 1999: 319-32) than their nonabused counterparts. IPV has
also been associated with an increase in suicidal tendencies,
particularly when the ‘pre-battering phase’ of women’s lives
is compared post abuse. (Hoff: 1990) However, how women’s
mental health is affected over time after leaving an abusive
relationship has not been studied.
The extensive health, social, and economic costs of violence
against women in Canada have been estimated by researchers
such as Day, (1995) Greaves, Hankivsky, and Kingston- Riechers,
(1995) and Kerr and McLean. (1996) However, these and studies
in other countries (such as VicHealth, 2004, and Stanko, et
al, 1998) have been based on analyses of data previously collected
for other purposes. (Yodanis, Godenzi, and Stanko, 2000: 263-76)
Because the data available tend to be state data, and because
costing approaches use such biased estimates as gendered averagewage
estimates, estimates have built-in biases. Consequently, the
Women’s Health Effects Study uses a gender- and diversity-sensitive
approach to costing (Hankivsky, et al, 2004: 257-82) and prospective,
longitudinal data collection, as well as expanding the type
of data being collected to include non-state costs.
WOMEN’S HEALTH EFFECTS STUDY
This quantitative analysis of the health, economic, and social
costs of IPV against women is being undertaken to address
significant gaps and limitations in knowledge. The accuracy
and depth of information about women’s mental- and physical-health
status is limited by dependence on self-report measures. Reliance
on both clinical and shelter populations challenges the ability
to generalize study findings. Furthermore, the use of cross-sectional
and retrospective designs makes it difficult to identify patterns
of chronic mental- and physical-health problems attributable
to abuse and experienced over time.
Although no longitudinal studies of the health effects of
abuse have been conducted in Canada, results of the few longitudinal
studies of the health effects of IPV that have been conducted
in the US (Eby, et al, 1995: 563-76; Campbell and Soeken,
1999: 21-40) suggest that some aspects of both physical and
mental health improve after leaving, but that patterns of
effects are complex. Thus, Rollstin and Kern (1998: 387- 94)
recommended studying the health effects of abuse for one to
five years after women have left abusive relationships. Our
recent research suggests that after leaving an abusive partner,
health problems are exacerbated for well beyond five years
by a combination of ongoing abuse and harassment related to
issues such as custody and child support, economic hardships,
and the personal ‘costs’ of getting help from those in the
system, including health professionals. (Wuest, et al, 2003:
597-622; Varcoe and Irwin, 2004: 77-99; Wuest and Merritt-Gray,
1999: 110-33) However, little is known about when and under
which conditions specific health effects of IPV emerge, and
how these health problems change over time in response to
changes in women’s lives, including their access to personal,
social, and economic resources.
The Women’s Health Effects Study is being conducted by researchers
in NB, ON, and BC from nursing, sociology, political science,
and medicine with consultants from economics and other relevant
fields. The study is part of a larger New Emerging Team (NET)
grant funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
(CIHR), and also has funding from the CIHR Gender and Health
Institute. The NET grant is intended to build research capacity
in the area of violence and health, and will fund additional
studies, including a study that will test interventions designed
on the basis of findings from the current study.
At this point, we have begun to examine the findings from
the initial year of data collection. Early examination of
the data suggests that the women in the sample are similar
to women in earlier studies in terms of high levels of chronic
illness and pain, and mental-health problems, along with high
rates of prescription drug use and use of health and social
services. This preliminary examination also suggests other
findings of concern. For example, many of the women being
studied have experienced multiple forms of abuse over their
life times (such as childhood abuse and sexual assault, as
well as IPV in adulthood) and most report a decreased standard
of living and signi.cant levels of financial strain after
leaving their partners. We anticipate having analysis of the
first-year data available in the early fall of 2005.
To receive bulletins regarding the research findings, please
visit http://www.women-health.ca or email women-health@uwo.ca.
We are still seeking about 10 more women in the Lower Mainland
of BC to participate. Interested women can email us or call
our toll-free number, 1.866.661.3343.
Colleen Varcoe is an Associate Professor at the UBC School
of Nursing. Her clinical background is critical care. Her
research focuses on women’s health with emphasis on violence
against women; and ethical practice in health care, with an
emphasis on equity. She is also a member of the Board of Directors
of BCIFV. Credit for the information in this article must
go to the entire Women’s Health Effects Study research team.
REFERENCES
Campbell, J, and Lewandowski, L (1997) “Mental and psychical
health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children,”
in Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20(2): 353-74.
Campbell, J, and Soeken, K (1999) “Women’s responses to battering
over time: An analysis of change,” in Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 14(1): 21-40.
Coker, AL, et al (2000) “Physical health consequences of
physical and psychological intimate partner violence,” in
Archives of Family Medicine, 9(5): 451-7.
Coker, AL, et al, (2000) “Frequency and correlates of intimate
partner violence by type: physical, sexual, and psychological
battering,” in American Journal of Public Health, 90(4): 553-9.
Coyne, J, Fechner-Bates, S, and Schwenk, T (1994) “Prevalence,
nature and comorbidity of depressive disorders in primary
care,” in General Hospital Psychiatry, 16: 267-76.
Day, T (1995) The Health-related Costs of Violence against
Women in Canada, London ON: Center for Research on Violence
Against Women and Children.
Eby, KK, et al (1995) “Health effects of experiences of sexual
violence for women with abusive partners,” in Health Care
for Women International, 16(6): 563-76.
Fischbach, R, and Herbert, B (1997) “Domestic violence and
mental health: Correlates and conundrums within and across
cultures,” in Social Science and Medicine, 45(8): 1161-76.
Greaves, L, Hankivsky, O, and Kingston- Riechers, J (1995)
Selected Estimates of Costs of Violence against Women, London
ON: Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children.
Hankivsky, O, et al (2004) “Expanding economic costing in
health care: Values, gender and diversity,” in Canadian Public
Policy, 30(3): 257-82.
Heise, LL, Pitanguy, J, and Germain, A (1994) “Violence against
women: The hidden health burden,” World Bank Discussion Papers,
Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
/ World Bank.
Hoff, LA (1990) Battered Women as Survivors, London: Routledge.
Humphreys, J, et al (1999) “Trauma history of sheltered battered
women,” in Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20(4): 319-32.
Humphreys, J, Parker, B, and Campbell, J (2001) “Intimate
partner violence against women,” in Annual Review of Nursing
Research, 19: 275-306.
Kerr, R, and McLean, J (1996) Paying for Violence: Some of
the costs of violence against women in BC, Victoria BC: Ministry
of Women’s Equality.
Letourneau, E, Holmes, M, and Chasedunn- Roark, H (1999)
“Gynecologic health consequences to victims of interpersonal
violence,” in Women’s Health Issues, 9: 115-20.
Muellman, RL, Lenaghan, PA, and Pakieser, RA (1996) “Battered
women: injury locations and types,” Annals of Emergency Medicine,
28(5): 468-92.
Murray, C, and Lopez, A, Ed’s (1996) The Global Burden of
Disease, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Ratner, P (1995) “Indicators of exposure to wife abuse,”
in Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 27(1): 31-46.
Rollstin, AO, and Kern, JM (1998) “Correlates of battered
women’s psychological distress: Severity of abuse and duration
of the post abuse period,” in Psychological Report, 82(2):
387-94.
Stanko, E, et al (1998) Counting the Costs: Estimating the
impact of domestic violence in the London Borough of Hakney,
Middlesex UK: Brunel University.
Varcoe, C, and Irwin, L (2004) “‘If I killed you, I’d get
the kids’: Women’s survival and protection work with child
custody and access in the context of woman abuse,” in Qualitative
Sociology, 27(1): 77-99.
VicHealth (2004) The Health Costs of Violence: Measuring
the burden of disease caused by intimate partner violence,
Carlton South Victoria, Au: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
Wuest, J, and Merritt-Gray, M (1999) “Not going back: Sustaining
the separation in the process of leaving abusive relationships,”
in Violence Against Women, 5(2): 110-33.
Wuest, J, et al (2003) “Intrusion: The central problem for
health promotion among children and single mothers after leaving
an abusive partner,” in Qualitative Health Research, 13(5):
597-622.
Yodanis, C, Godenzi, A, and Stanko, E (2000) “The bene.ts
of studying costs: A review and agenda for studies on the
ecomomic costs of violence against women,” in Policy Studies,
21(3): 263-76.
|  |